u know what? the more i think about it the more i realize just how lazily done frozen is. let us take a look at some of the evidence that i have not seen pointed out yet.
-there is cold weather through the WHOLE MOVIE! but yet.. nobody’s breath is showing? EVER? except maybe one time that i recall and they were in a HOUSE. god damn it disney. people need to breathe.
-how can elsa breathe let alone sing at such a high elevation? also how did she walk so gracefully through that snow in an ankle-length dress. there is no way this is possible.
-sven is a reindeer but yet disnbey makes him act like a dog? Um, i am a reindeer expert and i know that christoph could be KILLED by sven at any time. this is an unrealistic expectation that disney is giving to kids and telling them they could have reindeer as pets. also “reindeers” is not a real word. even my spellcheck is telling me so.
so these are just 3 HUGE MISTAKES that i think are very much more important than those clipping errors. have you also noticed that no snow sticks to anyones clothes as they walk through it? everyone just clips through the whole fucking movie. holy shit. i cant believe This
I think you’re kind of stretching the whole “huge mistakes” thing a bit much.
- Depending on humidity, you may or may not see your breath as you breathe. It is highly possible to have high humidity in freezing weather, and if the air has more moisture than what your breath produces, you see no little breath puffs.
- Elsa can create ice/snow, run on water, make herself a dress out of thin air…yet you’re asking why it’s possible for her to sing at those elevations and how she can walk in a dress through an element she can control. We know these things aren’t possible. Audiences aren’t so disillusioned that they’ll believe that these things can actually happen in real life. Just like no one actually believes that animals can talk or that toys can move. The point in storytelling is that the movie makes you accept that these things are possible/normal in that reality and the viewer will run with those ideas throughout the story.
- I’m just brainstorming here…they may have given Sven some of the characteristics of a dog so that he would give the aura of an unconditional companion. They grew up together, and may have wanted their interactions to be funny, friendly, relatable, etc… A relationship that kids could easily understand if they’ve encountered a dog.
And “unrealistic expectations”….give the kids some credit, yeah? They, too, have some understanding of what’s real and what’s part of the story. Knowing whether a reindeer can possibly be a pet (because it acts like a dog), or even safe to be around is something that can easily be run by a parent/family/guardian/etc. (Jasmine has a PET TIGER)
"Reindeers" is technically an acceptable plural form of reindeer. It just more commonly practiced to use “reindeer” in its plural form.
Please don’t take this as an aggressive post. I just want to lay out some things to maybe help you see how what you perceive as “mistakes” could possibly be part of the storytelling device.